July 10, 2010

Sucker


I'm gonna start this rant by saying I don't blame Lebron James for one thing, and one thing only. If I were a star athlete buried in a city like Cleveland, there is no way I'm staying there once my contract is up. He signed a short-term deal with them to try and bring them a championship, but he knew full-well that he was bolting town once he inevitably failed to do so. Over the years, the Cavs have tried everything to give this guy what he "needed" to bring the city the title it had long waited for. They had Ilgauskus when he showed up, they traded for Shaq, Mo Williams had an All-Star year, and then they went out and brought in Antawn Jamison. In his seven-year tenure with his hometown team, James only reached the NBA Finals one time! For those of you not keeping track...Wade won one, and Kobe went to four and won two. Oh, and that one time Lebron made it to the show...he got swept by Tim Duncan and the Spurs. During the last seven years, it has been obvious that James has cared more about his "brand" than winning.

Now, like I said, I don't blame him for leaving Cleveland. But, signing on with two other superstars in South Beach is the most laughable part of all this. To me, it never really was a debate. Kobe has and will always be the best player of this generation. I'm not really a big NBA guy, in fact, I despise the league, but it's been my firm belief that a guy with two rings during a given period will always trump a guy without any. A lot of people thought Kobe needed Shaq to win on the big stage...he thwarted that argument fairly quickly. Where Bryant was able to do it himself, James could never elevate his game to win it "by himself," despite the fact that he was "the best player in the world." Watching Celtics playoff basketball was never about watching the Green win, because I don't care. For me, it was all about watching them knock Lebron out of the Playoffs. Especially this year. Cavs' owner Dan Gilbert said it right, Lebron quit. He knew the Celts were a hard matchup, so he fabricated an injured elbow and used that as an excuse to take a Sunday-stroll through the series...bravo Lebrick!

But lets get back to the current situation. Had he ditched the Cavs for a team like Chicago, it would have been fine. He would have done what any other "real" superstar would have...go head to head with your enemy! Instead, he chose the easy rode and said to himself..."Well, I guess I can't be Dwayne and Chris when they're together, I guess I'll just join them and hope they can get me a ring!" Can you imagine if Magic, Bird, Jordan, or Kobe did the same? You can't? Me neither, because those guys are competitors. Instead of trying to cement his legend as one of the greatest basketball players of all time, Lebron was more concerned with the Lebron James brand. He would rather have all the spotlight put on him in Miami, where me might be fortunate enough to ride D-Wade to a title, instead of being the lone-stud in Chicago, New York, or even Cleveland in an effort to vault himself into the category of all-time greats. He has said time and time again that he is all about winning, and that it was the reason he chose South Beach. But don't be fooled, his decision was made from a marketing stand-point...anything to be the most recognizable face on the planet. Oh, and Lebron...Kobe already dominates the world market in terms of fanfare. Why? Because he wins, and he wins by himself! That is something you'll never be able to do.

Now, the most questioned aspect of this whole ordeal is how 3 "stud" players who all love to score are going to distribute the basketball. The NBA has been and always will be a league where one player can drastically change the face of a game. More than any other sport, it promotes the play of superstars. A team can win with a single player taking control of a game. For Lebron, it was much like that during his tenure in Cleveland...it's just too bad he isn't Kobe-good or else he might already have a ring. But now you've got three of those guys on one team. Two things that all of those types of players have in common is that they are selfish and they're cocky. It will be a matter of time until James or Wade starts getting uncomfortable when the other gets to take the last second shot. It'll only be a matter of time before Chris Bosh gets sick of going under-noticed in Miami when he could have been the "IT" player in another city. It will only be a matter of time before the ego's of all 3 get in the way of winning. So, for the Heat, I hope you enjoy it. For Bosh and James, I hope both of you regret your decision come this time next year.

Lets get back to this whole marketing ploy for a second. Lebron just couldn't bear to be like everybody else. Instead of us reading that he signed with the Heat on the bottom-ticker of any sports channel, Lebron had to take it to new heights. He couldn't just break the heart of every person in that horrible city in Ohio (which he still laughably calls "home") in a normal way. Instead, he had to call a one-hour "The Decision" special so that he could make a mockery of all the fans that had given him everything over the last seven years. And as much as I understand the marketing aspect for ESPN...they should be embarrassed for the whole ordeal. Yea, I know they wanna boost their ratings, it's their job. But to promote James' selfish and self-promoting behavior is something I thought even ESPN was above...guess not. The worst part about the whole thing was that ESPN was fake-reporting for weeks. Just to get those viewers for their Thursday-night Primetime Special, they just kept churning out new headlines saying Lebron was going here, or Lebron was going there! If there was one humane-feeling person with any sense of a brain at ESPN these days (aside from John Buccigross and Barry Melrose) it has to be Michael Wilbon. You could tell that during the whole special, he was just sitting in his chair thinking to himself how stupid the situation was and how childish James' behavior had become. Wilbon, you're still not a very sports-reporter, but it's nice to see you have a brain.

Then, to add to the whole joke, the Heat held a "party" for their 3-headed "monster." Smooth move, Miami. Lets have three grown men elevate onto the stage with their backs to the crowd with music blaring and smoke and neon lights! What the fuck is this? A fucking Lady Gaga concert? For that ordeal, the Heat should be embarrassed. You would think that their strategy to bring in those three players to play on the same team would be enough to garner plenty of fan support and attention. Nope. Instead, they had to go overboard with theatrics like the NBA usually does.

The only person in the whole situation who has gotten my respect is Dan Gilbert. Owning an NBA franchise generally leads to me disrespecting that person (save for Mark Cuban), but Dan Gilbert was spot-on with his comments. Lebron ditched the city, ditched the team. Instead of thanking the fans for their support, he took the low road and went with the simple: "They'll have mixed feelings in Cleveland. Some will appreciate me for all that I have given the city, and some won't because they'll feel I have turned my back on them." News flash you fucking dipshit: YOU DIDN'T DO ANYTHING FOR THAT CITY! You play basketball for a fucking living! People pay HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS, sometimes THOUSANDS, to come watch your whole fucking charade! All for what? A couple early playoff exits? You giving up on your team against the Celtics? Yea, you gave them a ton, didn't you? It's amazing how self-promoting the NBA and it's players are. It's actually laughable. Dan Gilbert knows that Lebron sold-out. He knows that Lebron only cares about himself, and he isn't afraid to expose it. One of the best parts of this is that Fathead (owned by Gilbert) reduced the cost of Lebron James "wall-art" from $99 to $17.41 (the year Benedict Arnold was born). James is the modern-day Benedict Arnold! Instead of trying to beat his rival, he joined them. Not that it's going to happen, but I wish Gilbert and the Cavs all the luck in the world in trying to uphold their owner's guarantee of a championship before the Heat.

There are no winners that come from the 2010 NBA Free Agent class. The Cavs are the obvious losers. The Heat should be embarrassed for the after-party. Lebron will never be in the class of "all-time greats." Bosh will never again be a front man, he'll just be the bass player. Dan Gilbert, even though he's right, will now be looked at as a "sore-loser." The Knicks, Nets, and Bulls all scrambled to clear the cap space necessary for Lebron, and they all came up short. ESPN will now have the tarnished rep for allowing Lebron's diva-campaign to continue. And, most importantly, the NBA is diminished. Where other sports celebrate "home-cookin'" and loyalty (Ok, not Curtis Martin or Johnny Damon, but you get the point), the NBA promotes slash-and-burn. More importantly, the whole cap-situation in the NBA, with "max contracts" and "mid-level exceptions" and "soft-caps" is an absolute joke. Cool, you've got a $50 million dollar cap. Well, the Lakers just won a championship with a payroll of $91 million. They beat the Celtics, who had an $83 million payroll. Good job NBA, way to be a capped-league with teams operating at $30 million over the "cap."

The biggest question I have for basketball fans: How can you possibly take the NBA seriously?

15 comments:

  1. AnonymousJuly 10, 2010

    no offense dunbar but this is one of the stupidest things you have written. how you got from lebron joining wade to lebron all about lebron brand made no logical sense and was just your bias against lebron.

    ReplyDelete
  2. geez.. that was harsh. Dunbar, Lebron played with NOTHING. Mo Williams, Shaq, and Big Z are JOKES! Mo Williams is laughable.

    Kobe won because he had GASOL (top 3 big man in the game), Artest, Fisher, and Bynum. Kobe had the best roster in the NBA! You put LeBron on that team they win it every year!

    the Cavs lead the NBA in wins with 61 with a roster of crap. Lebron is that good. Stop harping that he did not win a championship. Jordan would not have won one with that Cavs roster.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brian, yes it is my bias against Lebron somewhat. I just kind of ranted. But what do you think is better for the Lebron brand? Him being in Cleveland with Wilson's "buncha nobody's" or him playing as part of the best 3-some in NBA history? He joined Wade because he has no competitive spirit and because he wanted to market himself as part of that 3-some and on South Beach.

    And Wils...yea Kobe's roster was better than Lebron's. And I can say you're right about Gasol, but don't say that Bynum was effective! Artest is tuuuurribal! And Fisher is literally 50 years old I think!

    Oh, and Jordan WOULD have won with that roster. Why? Because come crunch-time, MJ wouldn't be complaining about "being hit in the funny bone."

    I'll continue to harp on Lebron's inability to win in Cleveland, because as one of the "greatest of all time" in the sport of BASKETBALL, you should be able to win things by yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    no no no lebron brand stuff is semi crap. you can completely fault lebron for on court (despite what wils says if you make the finals and have back to back 60 game seasons and you are the best player in the game you should have a ring... if you can win the most games regular season you can win the most in the postseason), you can fault him for his ego "the decision" etc. but the decision was a good one and not entirely for his brand. i object to brand stuff because new york is by far biggest stage... miami dolphins play in same city... a team in foxboro and new york get way more hype and attention every year. miami is not a big market. i have no problem saying lebron isnt as good as mj but you and justin keep role playing espn analysts by saying its his spirit that seperates him from mj. mjs competitiveness can easily be construed as a strength or weakness. he alienated teammates. killed other peoples confidence, was so competitive within team that if not for being in a perfect situation (market, coach, teammates) its conceivable that he would not have won at all. mju didnt have to move get a top 50 (some people say top 30) plyer in nba history. what is so wrong with lebron being proactive, instead of fallnig into a perfect situation liek mj he has made it in miami. he is playing with his friends, he is playing with a 10x better big three than boston, he sacrificed 40 million over 6 years (according to report on espn the other day, no clue how accurate) clearly knowingly sacrificed his reptuation, and he didnt pick the biggest market. he picked the situation which he thought was best for him to win in. if he wins 7 rings we wont be talking about how he wasnt mj enough we will be talking about how mj wasnt lebron enough. wasnt willing to put down his ego and stop acting like a dog trying to piss on his own territory. lebron is trying to share it. lebron is a douche for this whole process but it pisses me off how retarded peoples reactions are. they look down on the choice because of "the decision". they are unabel to seperate the process from its outcome. the whole circus was a joke, but miami was a good choice. and in sports "you should win things by yourself doesnt work" i dont think less of brady because he has won 0 rings by himself. always had coach, D and oline. one year he didnt have a good d he choked in the superbowl. yes football way more of a team sport than the egotisticl game of basketball but its never valid to look down on an athlete in a 'team sport' because he didnt play every position

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    screw your dumb blog dunbar. i posted that first comment and got a message saying it was too long and could nto be posted. so i narrowed my focus and published same idea in the second one. wouldnt have reposted

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    also here are some factual flaws in your rant:
    A.) During the last seven years, it has been obvious that James has cared more about his "brand" than winning.
    -lebrons brand has been winning. the thing to dislike about lebron is not that he doenst want to win. but that he sees his image as a part of winning. the media has always thought lebron was a team player because he actively attempted to portray himself as a team player. but that doesnt mean he doenst want to be an actual team player. same here. he is advertising he wants to win.. that doesnt mean he doesnt want to win. he has had the spotlight on him since he was 15 (and i hate defending lebron but) you cant blame him for seeing himself as others see him and trying to shape that image to what he wants it to be. all young star athletes are like this.. same with kobe. all their actions seem scripted and unnatural because every one of their moves on and offcourt is meticulously analyzed. by choosing miami i think its clear lebron wants to win.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    B.) miami cant win because the three are selfish and cocky. Im pretty sure within the context of the nba they arent overly either. take any team in nba and their top three is selfish and cocky. but someone has to win.
    C.) the nba doesnt care about keeping its stars in one location. half of the reason the nba has max contracts is to allow home teams to offer a higher offer sheet to players. no other sport has any system to keep home town players really.
    D.) heat party.... what nba team would have done that differently?
    E.) and this is the thing that annoys me most about coverage of lebron on espn.. everyone talked about the lebron thing in terms of capitalism. he would go to the biggest city or make the most moeny. if he left cleveland he would destroy the economy around the stadium (that he built). who gives a shit. why does everyone side with the business side of sports? why do people feel bad for the billionaire owner becaue he whines about how he just lost hundred million dollar product? if he thought so little of lebron why was his offer still up during the decision. nothing on that special should have changed anyones minds about lebron, and the two weeks leading up to the special only if you have dulled observational skills. gilbert gladly would be calling lebron a model citizen and a local hero if he had stayed and kept reeling in millinos and millions of dollars for him, but lebron would have the same ego. and in what way did gilberts letter embody any of the virtues that lebron apprently lacks? gilbert sounded like a 13 year old girl who just got dumped and broke into her parents liquor cabinet, had two sips of butterscotch schnapps and posted a rant in comic sans on facebook.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    to continue ranting becuase my family birthday party isnt overly exciting.....its annoying that people jump on lebrons ego now after witnessing the special and not before. what did they imagine it was going to be? the actual event wasnt the ego-fest it could have been. lebron looked incredibly uncomfortable. despite being illiterate he was stumbling over words more than usual, he was slouching, talking low, biting his lip, jutting tongue in his cheek, readjusting his posture, sucking in his lips,
    he was stressed, conflicted, tired, maybe even disgusted or ashamed.
    and i cant think of another way to interpret mom stuff besides him wanting to go to miami and thinking that was best place for him to "ween" but that he felt it was his responsibility and duty to stay in cleveland.

    but anyways thats enough defending lebron... i agree he is a douche and the best part of this situation his how much of an microcosm of the nba it is and yet at the same time it has changed everyones view of the nba. the ego, self inflicted drama, team vs legacy. every nba fan rationalizes these elements to justify the nba and yet this pathetic "decision" forced them all to reevaluate how the nba really operates. whining billionaires, primadona players, the whole league is founded on glitz. i enjoy people trying to deal with the truth that the nba is aj oke by coming up with more and more ludicrous explanations for this situation. everyone invokes mj not because there is any real comparison but because they are reaching back to an image of the nba which is solidified. yet everyone over looks that lebron took (now officially) 20 mil less to play with his friends and win a championship. no other sport would struggle as much with that information

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here's an idea, instead of posting all of this on the comments section, write a blog post mannn

    ReplyDelete
  11. also we need some patriots stuff on here, bmal get to it!

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousJuly 11, 2010

    haha patriots blog post would be so boring though. id talk forever about things no one cares about

    ReplyDelete
  13. Brian, I'm literally too lazy to read all of those comments. Dan's right, right a god damn post. But I'll touch on a few things.

    Firstly, Max-contracts. The NBA is the only league with a system like that because it's players are the most money-driven. Brady took less money to give the Pats a better opportunity to compete. Most other sports have players who want to win where they are. In basketball, to get a player to stay at home, they need to offer them 30 mil more just to do it. Keeping players in one spot is great, and it's good for sports. But just the fact that the NBA needs a system with max contracts and soft caps to make it happen is the worst part.

    Secondly, the Heat party. I'll tell you a team who would do it differently, the CELTICS! They had the first "Big 3." Keep in mind, Garnett was just about as big a superstar as Lebron at the time, he was elite. The Celtics got their Big 3 and took it in stride, they didn't need to unzip their pants and flash their raging boner to the world the way the Heat did though. Good for the Celtics, bad for the Heat.

    Third, the Heat and selfishness. Yea, the 3 best players on each team are probably cocky. BUT...when your Big 3 consists of 3 guys who wants to take 20 shots a game and score 30 points night in and night out, it doesn't compute. There are only so many shots to be taken, and I don't think it's going to be easy for any of those 3 to concede those shots to either of the others. It's not the cockiness part, it's the style of these 3 that will hurt them.

    I'll read your other comments later when I have the energy and will post a response to those. Other than that...happy birthday if it's your birthday. Happy belated if it's past.

    Schrute out.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh, and about you talking about things long and boring...You think anyone besides the 3 of us actually cares about my in-depth Bruins posts? Nope. I'm sure there is plenty more people ready to talk Patriots

    ReplyDelete
  15. better record next year B's or toronto?July 11, 2010

    brady is exception not the rule. (and who knows how much longer he will be that exception)
    and every player in sports is selfish and wants money. but lebron took less. and you said nba pathetic for not having a system which inspires people to stay home... well it does.

    and birthday not for a few days.

    too lazy to go to bruins articles to post comment but i like your lines over desjs just for the simple fact that desj has bergeron recci and lucic forming the no skate club on his second line

    ReplyDelete